Evidence-based confidence for investment, funding and board decisions
Our impartial programme review gives boards, funders and investors an evidence-based assessment of programme credibility and delivery risk. We test the critical path, key assumptions, progress and forecasts, clearly identifying the risks and assumptions that matter to investment, funding and governance decisions.
Decision-makers receive an impartial, evidence-based view of the construction programme, rather than relying solely on untested project reporting.
Impartial programme assurance for confident project decisions
At key approval gateways and during project delivery, we impartially assess whether the construction programme is credible and achievable.
Our review tests:
• programme logic
• critical path
• key interfaces
• progress
• forecasts
• delivery assumptions
providing decision-makers with an objective view of programme risk and the evidence needed to challenge unrealistic expectations.
Impartial programme review for an objective view of programme health
Our impartial programme assurance provides an objective assessment of programme credibility, progress, critical path, forecasts and delivery assumptions, separate from the team responsible for project delivery.
Where project reporting and the programme evidence do not align, we identify the difference clearly, explain its significance and set out the evidence supporting our findings.
Impartial EOT claim review and delay entitlement assessment
We impartially assess Extension of Time (EOT) claims against the construction programme, critical path, relevant contract provisions and contemporaneous project records. Our review identifies:
• where the claimed delay is supported by the programme and evidence
• where the duration or impact of delay is not substantiated
• where concurrent delay or other critical-path events affect the assessment
The result is a clear, evidence-based EOT and delay assessment that supports informed negotiation, claim rebuttal or formal dispute proceedings.
