Who we help
Where Expertise Matters Most
Lawyers & Litigation Teams
Expert Evidence that Withstands Scrutiny
When a matter proceeds to adjudication, arbitration or court, we provide the impartial technical evidence and reasoned expert opinion the case requires, prepared to the discipline a tribunal expects of an expert.
Our role
We provide impartial evidence and expert analysis, prepared with the discipline and objectivity required to withstand scrutiny in mediation, adjudication, arbitration and court proceedings.
How we help
Construction expert witness reports prepared to evidentiary standards
We prepare impartial expert witness reports for construction delay and dispute matters, supported by detailed analysis of project programmes, contemporaneous records and the available evidence. Our opinions clearly explain the methodology, assumptions, findings and limitations so that complex programme, critical-path and delay issues can be understood and tested in formal proceedings.
When acting as an expert witness, we comply with the Code of Conduct for Expert Witness under Schedule 4 of the High Court Rules.
Our opinions are objective, evidence-based and confined to matters within our expertise, rather than shaped by the position of the party instructing us.
Our expert evidence supports adjudication, arbitration and court proceedings, including matters requiring forensic delay analysis, critical-path analysis and impartial technical opinion.
Extension of Time Claims, Forensic Delay Analysis and Expert Evidence
We assist legal teams with the preparation, review and rebuttal of Extension of Time (EOT) claims, providing impartial programme and forensic delay analysis focused on the issues in dispute. We examine the relevant delay events, contemporaneous project records, programme logic and critical path to assess whether, and to what extent, the events relied upon affected project completion.
Our analysis is structured so that counsel can clearly understand the methodology, evidence, assumptions, critical-path impacts and limitations behind each conclusion. This provides a defensible technical foundation for assessing an EOT position, testing an opposing claim and developing the programme and delay evidence required for the dispute.
Where a matter progresses to adjudication, arbitration or court proceedings, our role can extend to impartial expert opinion and expert evidence, with the necessary distinction maintained between claims support and the impartial duties of an expert witness.
Our delay analysis follows recognised industry guidance and methodologies such as the Society of Construction Law Delay and Disruption Protocol and AACE International.
Impartial review of opposing expert delay analysis, methodology and assumptions
We assist legal teams by undertaking a critical review of opposing construction delay expert evidence, examining the methodology applied, factual and programme assumptions adopted, source records relied upon, critical-path analysis and the reasoning supporting the expert's conclusions.
Our review identifies where opinions are supported by the programme and contemporaneous evidence, where assumptions materially influence the analysis, and where methodological or evidential issues require closer examination. The objective is not simply to identify disagreement, but to explain the technical basis for each point clearly and in a form that counsel can use to isolate the matters genuinely in dispute.
Where required, our findings can inform expert reply evidence, EOT claim rebuttal, expert conferencing and preparation for adjudication, arbitration or court proceedings, while maintaining the impartiality required of the expert witness.
Expert conferencing, concurrent evidence and cross-examination
We are experienced in expert conferencing, concurrent expert evidence and cross-examination, providing clear and impartial technical opinion on construction delay, critical-path and programming issues.
During expert engagement, we identify the matters that can properly be agreed, isolate the technical issues that remain in dispute, and clearly explain the methodology, assumptions, evidence and reasoning supporting our opinion.
Where evidence is tested at a hearing, our approach remains grounded in the project records, programme analysis and the impartial duties of the expert witness. This enables complex forensic delay and critical-path evidence to be explained and defended under technical scrutiny and cross-examination.
Confidential enquiry
Request a Confidential Discussion
If your project is delayed, contested or at risk, the first step is a confidential conversation. We will listen, assess whether we can help, and explain the process — without obligation.